<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
    <title>Comments for Where are the great CSS books?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css" />
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2007://4-</id>
    <updated>2005-08-19T09:44:50Z</updated>
    <subtitle>The man, the legend.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type -en-trunk--20070910</generator>
 

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627-comment:1219</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css#c1219" />
    <title>Comment from Arve Bersvendsen on 2003-06-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Arve Bersvendsen</name>
        <uri>http://www.virtuelvis.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.virtuelvis.com/">
        Actually, I don't believe a <em>great</em> CSS books exists. 

<p>I actually think one would be better off with two or three books: one on typography/graphical design for beginners, one on accessibility, and a book like Eric Meyers - it serves it's purpose because of the <em>techniques</em>, not because of Eric's visual design skills, but because of his CSS skills.</p>

<p>I'm believe that a book that tries to cover both subjects has the potential of actually confusing the readers.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-06-18T18:56:30Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627-comment:1223</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css#c1223" />
    <title>Comment from Dave S. on 2003-06-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dave S.</name>
        <uri>http://www.mezzoblue.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mezzoblue.com/">
        Allow me to theorize for a bit here. The visual graphic designers who do the kind of work that make your eyes smile are the same that pick up Flash in a heartbeat to do a job, rather than fool around with CSS. If they are forced to use HTML instead, CSS is just there for typography control and nothing more.

<p>I came from that perspective. Then I realized what CSS can actually do. And I started noticing that I was one of few noticing, at least when compared to other designers.</p>

<p>So there is a hole that needed filling. Hopefully the Zen Garden is the first shovel-full, and once the designers catch on and pitch in a shovel or two themselves the ideas will start flowing, and someone along the way will write a book.</p>

<p>So that was the long answer. The short answer is: cause the people who should be writing it aren't using CSS yet.</p>

<p>No promises on time, but my next Zen Garden design will include a case study on how I went from Photoshop to CSS. Stay tuned.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-06-19T01:49:10Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627-comment:1379</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css#c1379" />
    <title>Comment from  on 2003-08-04</title>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        I believe the CSS situation is roughly similar to the the time just after desk top publishing was introduced - all sorts of people used Page Maker because they could - and reams of dodgey layouts polluted the printing world.

<p>Maybe it is time to fully recognise that web design and implemention are different skill sets,<br />
and maybe we could then get CSS books, (and XML books) that talk to each discipline.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-08-04T10:47:16Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627-comment:1415</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css#c1415" />
    <title>Comment from  on 2003-08-10</title>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        I was recently looking for exactly the same book.  There needs to be a CSS book that is really a brainstorming book accompanied by a separate area for actual code. Perhaps two books for easy comparison of look and code?  ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-08-11T04:26:14Z</published>
</entry>


<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627-ping:867</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css#p867" />
    <title>Keyword confusion</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kalsey Consulting Group :: Measure Twice</name>
        <uri>http://kalsey.com/blog/2003/06/keyword_confusion/index.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kalsey.com/blog/2003/06/keyword_confusion/index.html">
        Some of my document metadata was misinterpreted by a reader. Should I be doing something differently?
    </content>
    <published>2003-06-19T02:14:38Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627-ping:868</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css#p868" />
    <title>Keyword confusion</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kalsey Consulting Group :: Measure Twice</name>
        <uri>http://kalsey.com/blog/2003/06/keyword_confusion/index.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kalsey.com/blog/2003/06/keyword_confusion/index.html">
        Some of my document metadata was misinterpreted by a reader. Should I be doing something differently?
    </content>
    <published>2003-06-19T02:18:52Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627-ping:875</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css#p875" />
    <title>Late Night -- Catching Up On Other Blogs</title>
    <author>
        <name>On the Fritz - Observations of Modern Life</name>
        <uri>http://www.fritzliess.com/movabletype/archives/000210.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fritzliess.com/movabletype/archives/000210.html">
        Well, I finally launched the Web site that I&apos;ve been working on for the past nine months. It still needs to have some loose ends taken care of, but I&apos;m proud of it. Now, I can finally stop working into...
    </content>
    <published>2003-06-22T12:25:00Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627-ping:881</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1627" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/06/18/css#p881" />
    <title>CSS Zen Garden</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tribblescape</name>
        <uri>http://tribble.dreamhost.com/archives/20030624_css_zen_garden.php</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://tribble.dreamhost.com/archives/20030624_css_zen_garden.php">
        CSS is supposed to be the best thing to happen to Web pages since Mosaic. So why are so many Web designers still formatting their pages using tables? Because they haven&apos;t seen the CSS Zen Garden yet. This site is...
    </content>
    <published>2003-06-24T19:51:21Z</published>
</entry>

</feed>