<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
    <title>Comments for Uninstalling the Sanitize plugin</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/02/19/movable-type" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/02/19/movable-type" />
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2007://4-</id>
    <updated>2006-03-19T23:15:50Z</updated>
    <subtitle>The man, the legend.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type -en-trunk--20070910</generator>
 

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1452-comment:756</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1452" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/02/19/movable-type"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/02/19/movable-type#c756" />
    <title>Comment from David Raynes on 2003-02-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>David Raynes</name>
        <uri>http://www.rayners.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rayners.org">
        Is it just me, Brad, or should those two filenames be the other way 'round? :)]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-02-19T23:27:25Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1452-comment:757</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1452" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/02/19/movable-type"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/02/19/movable-type#c757" />
    <title>Comment from Brad Choate on 2003-02-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Brad Choate</name>
        <uri>http://www.bradchoate.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bradchoate.com/">
        Whatever do you mean? They look fine to me! :-)]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-02-19T23:31:57Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1452-comment:758</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1452" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/02/19/movable-type"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/02/19/movable-type#c758" />
    <title>Comment from nick on 2003-02-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>nick</name>
        <uri>http://www.theblivit.net/weblog/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.theblivit.net/weblog/">
        i guess it doesn't particularly matter, but are there any ill effects of leaving your plugin files where they're at? because i'm too lazy to delete them right now.]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-02-19T23:49:10Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1452-comment:760</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1452" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/02/19/movable-type"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/02/19/movable-type#c760" />
    <title>Comment from Brad Choate on 2003-02-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Brad Choate</name>
        <uri>http://www.bradchoate.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bradchoate.com/">
        I haven't heard or seen any ill effects of leaving the files there. My guess is that if you do, the old code will still be used to actually strip the tags. Since it isn't aware of the MT preference fields that were introduced with 2.6, those preferences will probably not be used. So don't use the "sanitize='1'" technique until you've removed the old plugin files.]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-02-20T18:02:06Z</published>
</entry>


</feed>