<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
    <title>Comments for Blog These</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/01/28/rss" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/01/28/rss" />
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2007://4-</id>
    <updated>2005-08-19T09:44:51Z</updated>
    <subtitle>The man, the legend.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type -en-trunk--20070910</generator>
 

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1412-comment:631</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1412" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/01/28/rss"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/01/28/rss#c631" />
    <title>Comment from Mark on 2003-01-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mark</name>
        <uri>http://diveintomark.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
        Nah, Radio already does all that, has for over a year now.  I want to cut out the drudgery of actually going out and finding new content.

<p>Then again, if I'd already written such a script, would you be able to tell the difference?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-01-28T20:57:37Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1412-comment:632</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1412" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/01/28/rss"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/01/28/rss#c632" />
    <title>Comment from Mark on 2003-01-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mark</name>
        <uri>http://diveintomark.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
        MT bookmarklets and MozBlog do it too, separate from an aggregator.  But they only work on stuff you've already found, which means that weblogs tend to get stuck in a rut, quoting the same people over and over (because the software makes it easy to quote people in your subscription list, but difficult to quote anyone else).

<p>Why can't it auto-find other people talking about the same link (via "track this" and "citations" links at Blogdex and Daypop, or similar things at Technorati), auto-download them, and do a diff to see if they're adding anything original to the conversation.</p>

<p>Plus, all of the current tools suck at excerpting quotes.  At best they just regurgitate the excerpt posted by the author, which itself may have been auto-generated (exceedingly poorly) by their publishing software.  The rest don't even do that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-01-28T21:05:56Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1412-comment:633</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1412" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/01/28/rss"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/01/28/rss#c633" />
    <title>Comment from Brad Choate on 2003-01-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Brad Choate</name>
        <uri>http://www.bradchoate.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bradchoate.com/">
        Those tools can do it 'one at a time', but not as I have described. Being able to cull multiple quotations together from multiple sources. And I realize current tools suck at excerpting quotes. That's what a human editor is for. So you highlight the portion you wish to quote, click 'Add' and repeat. Then click 'Blog These' to create a post that uses all the selections you made. The pre-composed entry would be edited further to annotate as desired.

<p>And yes, I think I would notice if a fully automated script were being used to do this kind of thing. It would also make for dull reading. When someone cites a source, the purpose should be for further discussion. So a citation should usually be followed with a response. Simple regurgitation -- even through complex means -- doesn't interest me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-01-28T22:51:48Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1412-comment:634</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1412" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/01/28/rss"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/01/28/rss#c634" />
    <title>Comment from Mike Krus on 2003-01-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mike Krus</name>
        <uri>http://www.newsisfree.com/blog/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.newsisfree.com/blog/">
        NewsIsFree does that. You can register any number of blogs which support the Blogger API, and post any number of items directly to one or more of them.]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-01-29T00:35:34Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1412-comment:635</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2003://4.1412" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/01/28/rss"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2003/01/28/rss#c635" />
    <title>Comment from Brad Choate on 2003-01-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Brad Choate</name>
        <uri>http://www.bradchoate.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bradchoate.com/">
        That's cool, Mike -- and while I use and appreciate NewsIsFree, I prefer it as a syndication service. I read a number of sites now through RSS that I couldn't before. But my client is Syndirella. Using the web to read RSS is a little clumsy and slow, even over broadband. The speed at which I can scan through headlines in Syndirella is dizzying by comparison.]]>
    </content>
    <published>2003-01-29T00:48:20Z</published>
</entry>


</feed>