<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
    <title>Comments for Blogging in Reverse</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse" />
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2007://4-</id>
    <updated>2006-03-20T19:17:23Z</updated>
    <subtitle>The man, the legend.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type -en-trunk--20070910</generator>
 

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159-comment:419</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse#c419" />
    <title>Comment from Eduardo on 2002-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eduardo</name>
        <uri>http://www.naborsapts.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.naborsapts.org/">
        I would love to be able to set up a blog like that for my co-op's Web site. At the moment, we have a static FAQ page and a discussion board (not MT) that is almost never used. It would be great if I could include a simple "Ask a Question" button at several strategic places throughout our Web site, which would make the MT Bookmarklet pop up and the person asking the question could ask away.

<p>Is there a way of passing the "username" and "password" for the "guest author" (i.e., the visitor) as a hidden form variable or as a URL string--from the MT Bookmarklet? The bookmarklet template itself could be modified to exclude the Post Status drop-down menu (how?), and the blog could be set up to default to "Draft," so that the guest author would only be able to submit a draft. The guest author would also be given permission only for posting, but no other permissions. They wouldn't be able to edit the posts or change it from "Draft" to "Publish."</p>

<p>But then how would you keep the guest author from actually loging onto the MT console? They should have access to the blog only via the special Bookmarklet.</p>

<p>Brad, I think it's a great idea, and would love to see a solution one day.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2002-11-13T08:38:21Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159-comment:420</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse#c420" />
    <title>Comment from Dylan on 2002-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dylan</name>
        <uri>http://www.lowdownmag.cc</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lowdownmag.cc">
        Are you God? Are you listening to my prayers? heh

<p>I recently posted on the forum about something like this. </p>

<p>I am making a site which is based around interactivity. I want people to be able to post reviews, articles, stuff like that. </p>

<p>After searching for something that could accomplish this task, I had no luck. I was just going to do this with comments. However, I wanted something that could be screened for junk and could be commented on itself. </p>

<p>I really need something like this, I really hope you're inspired to work on this so that I can use it! heh. It's a great idea I think alot of people would take advantage.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2002-11-13T10:24:42Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159-comment:422</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse#c422" />
    <title>Comment from paul hammond on 2002-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>paul hammond</name>
        <uri>http://www.paranoidfish.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.paranoidfish.org/">
        You could create some kind of webform to movable type api gateway.  This would keep the username and password hidden from the world whilst allowing anyone to add an entry.

<p>I've been meaning to create this for months - hopefully someone else will get there first...</p>

<p>(btw, comment previews are broken)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2002-11-13T15:10:23Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159-comment:424</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse#c424" />
    <title>Comment from chris on 2002-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>chris</name>
        <uri>http://www.chrisdiclerico.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chrisdiclerico.com">
        Hi. I have also been banging my head against the wall looking for the best way to do the same thing. 

<p>I came up with this. I am waiting for Ben to implement email posting. Then I will set up a form that uses a simple cgimail to always post as guest. I'll put the form on the site, and that'll be that. Of course I need to wait for Ben. There is probably a pretty easy way to use the MT API to make a form that does the posting directly, but I don't see how you could prevent users from logging into the control panel. </p>

<p>I had a guest account set up for a few days, username "guest", password "guest" kind of thing. I encouraged people to log in that way. Then, when a good friend figured out a way to go in and edit previous posts and change authors and stuff, I disabled it. Therefore, I do not trust the MT control panel security.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2002-11-13T19:19:57Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159-comment:425</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse#c425" />
    <title>Comment from larcher on 2002-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>larcher</name>
        <uri>http://www.spoon.cx/~larcher/blog/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.spoon.cx/~larcher/blog/">
        Many apologies, Brad -- my TrackBacking experiments went  awry and I accidentally sent 2 pings for one post..   Is there any way to 'retract' a ping? :)   <br />
Anyway, neat idea .. seems like it'd be useful on a lot of sites.<br />
]]>
    </content>
    <published>2002-11-14T01:10:47Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159-comment:426</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse#c426" />
    <title>Comment from lashlar on 2002-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>lashlar</name>
        <uri>http://www.whisperingwords.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.whisperingwords.net">
        Awesome idea.  It sounds really interesting.  Are you sure you're not God?  Because every time I visit your site, I come away aware of some new use for MT that I had never thought of before.  :-)   ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2002-11-14T02:17:57Z</published>
</entry>


<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159-ping:155</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse#p155" />
    <title>gniggolb</title>
    <author>
        <name>spoonful of antimatter</name>
        <uri>http://www.spoon.cx/~larcher/blog/archives/2002_11_13.html#000196</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.spoon.cx/~larcher/blog/archives/2002_11_13.html#000196">
        .. which is, of course, &quot;blogging&quot; in reverse. (couldn&apos;t resist, sorry.) Seriously though, nifty idea.. Here&apos;s a tiny variation: why not have it so more than one person can answer the questions too? Kind of like an inverted community blog. Anybody can ...
    </content>
    <published>2002-11-14T00:13:19Z</published>
</entry>

<entry>
    <id>tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159-ping:156</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:bradchoate.com,2002://4.1159" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse"/>
 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://bradchoate.com/weblog/2002/11/12/blogging-in-reverse#p156" />
    <title>gniggolb</title>
    <author>
        <name>spoonful of antimatter</name>
        <uri>http://www.spoon.cx/~larcher/blog/archives/2002_11_13.html#000196</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.spoon.cx/~larcher/blog/archives/2002_11_13.html#000196">
        .. which is, of course, &quot;blogging&quot; in reverse. (couldn&apos;t resist, sorry.) Seriously though, nifty idea.. Here&apos;s a tiny variation: why not have it so more than one person can answer the questions too? Kind of like an inverted community blog. Anybody can ...
    </content>
    <published>2002-11-14T00:54:15Z</published>
</entry>

</feed>